The Subject Vanishes: Jews, Heretics, and Martyrs after the Linguistic Turn

5Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The “linguistic turn” in early Christian studies, a signal contribution of the work of Elizabeth A. Clark, has raised scholarly awareness of the degree to which terms previously thought to describe social realia in fact function as discursive categories rhetorically deployed for various ends by ancient authors. With this new awareness, how then do we now move from—or work with—our texts’ rhetorical “Jews,” “heretics,” and “martyrs” to recover these ancient historical actors? How does thinking with ideas such as “religion” and “ethnicity,” or with terms such as “paganism,” “Judaism,” and “Christianity,” hinder or help our efforts? How do invocations of “persecution” throughout the first through fifth centuries serve as a dramatic medium for the internal construction of group identity? This essay explores these questions, while raising others about the lures of anachronism and the requirements of narrative for writing history—our own recreation of the past.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fredriksen, P. (2024). The Subject Vanishes: Jews, Heretics, and Martyrs after the Linguistic Turn. Journal of Early Christian Studies, 32(2), 151–169. https://doi.org/10.1353/earl.2024.a929876

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free