Sparsity in penalized empirical risk minimization

73Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Let (X,Y ) be a random couple in S × T with unknown distribution P. Let (X1,Y1), . . . , (Xn,Yn) be i.i.d. copies of (X,Y ), Pn being their empirical distribution. Let h1, . . . , hN : S → [-1, 1] be a dictionary consisting of N functions. For λ ∈ ℝN, denote f λ := ∑j=1N λj hj . Let ℓ : T × ℝ → ℝ be a given loss function, which is convex with respect to the second variable. Denote (ℓ • f )(x, y) := ℓ(y; f (x)). We study the following penalized empirical risk minimization problem λ̂ ε := argmin λ∈ℝN [Pn(ℓ • f λ)+ ε→λ→ℓpp] , which is an empirical version of the problem λ ε := argmin λ∈ℝN [Pn(ℓ • f λ)+ ε→λ→ℓpp] (here ε ≥ 0 is a regularization parameter; λ0 corresponds to ε = 0). A number of regression and classification problems fit this general framework. We are interested in the case when p ≥ 1, but it is close enough to 1 (so that p - 1 is of the order 1/logN , or smaller). We show that the "sparsity" of λε implies the "sparsity" of λ̂ε and study the impact of "sparsity" on bounding the excess risk P(ℓ • f̂λε ) - P(ℓ • fλ0 ) of solutions of empirical risk minimization problems. © 2009 Association des Publications de l'Institut Henri Poincaré.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Koltchinskii, V. (2009). Sparsity in penalized empirical risk minimization. Annales de l’institut Henri Poincare (B) Probability and Statistics, 45(1), 7–57. https://doi.org/10.1214/07-AIHP146

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free