Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Models for Data Classification: An In-Depth Exploration

  • Fazil A
  • Hakimi M
  • Akbari R
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This research delves into the realm of data classification using machine learning models, namely 'Random Forest', 'Support Vector Machine (SVM) ' and ‘Logistic Regression'. The dataset, derived from the Australian Government's Bureau of Meteorology, encompasses weather observations from 2008 to 2017, with additional columns like 'RainToday' and the target variable 'RainTomorrow.' The study employs various metrics, including Accuracy Score, 'Jaccard Index', F1-Score, Log Loss, Recall Score and Precision Score, for model evaluation. Utilizing libraries such as 'NumPy', Pandas, matplotlib and ‘sci-kit-learn', the data pre-processing involves one-hot encoding, balancing for class imbalance and creating training and test datasets. The research implements three models, Logistic Regression, SVM and Random Forest, for data classification. Results showcase the models' performance through metrics like ROC-AUC, log loss and Jaccard Score, revealing Random Forest's superior performance in terms of ROC-AUC (0.98), compared to SVM (0.89) and Logistic Regression (0.88). The analysis also includes a detailed examination of confusion matrices for each model, providing insights into their predictive accuracy. The study contributes valuable insights into the effectiveness of these models for weather prediction, with Random Forest emerging as a robust choice. The methodologies employed can be extended to other classification tasks, providing a foundation for leveraging machine learning in diverse domains.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fazil, A. W., Hakimi, M., Akbari, R., Quchi, M. M., & Khaliqyar, K. Q. (2023). Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Models for Data Classification: An In-Depth Exploration. Journal of Computer Science and Technology Studies, 5(4), 160–168. https://doi.org/10.32996/jcsts.2023.5.4.16

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free