Sedation by non-anesthesiologists: Are opioids and benzodiazepines outdated?

6Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

At least 3 systematic reviews have assessed the safety of propofol versus traditional agents used for sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures. These reviews uncovered a marked variability in study design and found the quality of the included randomized controlled trials to be poor. To date there is no demonstrated difference in the endoscopic safety or efficacy of propofol sedation compared to sedation with benzodiazepine with or without an opioid. However, a trend towards reduced complications and higher levels of satisfaction and cost-effectiveness with propofol during colonoscopies, and higher levels of patient satisfaction and improved efficacy may also be expected by using propofol during upper gastrointestinal endoscopies. Copyright © 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dinis-Ribeiro, M., & Vargo, J. J. (2010, April). Sedation by non-anesthesiologists: Are opioids and benzodiazepines outdated? Digestion. https://doi.org/10.1159/000287215

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free