Integrating Information Gain methods for Feature Selection in Distance Education Sentiment Analysis during Covid-19

8Citations
Citations of this article
63Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Sentiment analysis is a way to automatically understand and process text data to figure out how someone feels about an opinion sentence. If there are too many reviews, it will take a lot of time and they will start to be biased. Sentiment classification tries to solve this problem by putting user reviews into groups based on whether they are positive, negative, or neutral. The dataset comes from Drone Emprit Academic. It is made up of tweets with the words "online learning method" in them, with as many as 4887 data crawled from them. Information Gain and adaboost on the C4.5 (FS+C4.5) method are used in the feature selection method. We use feature options to get rid of bias and improve accuracy. The results of the experiments will be compared to other algorithms like C4.5 and random forest. Based on the results, the accuracy of the two standard decision tree models (C4.5 and random forest) went up from 48.21% and 50.35% to 94.47 %. The value of how accurate it was went up by 44 percent. The FS+C4.5 model, on the other hand, has an RMSE of 0.204 and a correlation of 0.944. So, adding the feature selection technique to the sentiment analysis of bold learning education can make the C4.5 algorithm even more accurate

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rijal, S., Cakranegara, P. A., Ciptaningsih, E. M. S. S., Pebriana, P. H., Andiyan, A., & Rahim, R. (2023). Integrating Information Gain methods for Feature Selection in Distance Education Sentiment Analysis during Covid-19. TEM Journal, 12(1), 285–290. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM121-35

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free