Audit on myocardial infarction in a district general hospital: Is there room for improvement in diagnostic accuracy?

3Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The proportion of patients with an acute myocardial infarction (MI) whose diagnosis was missed on admission was accessed. The admitting consultants were then tested to see if they could diagnose the patients correctly when they were shown the admission histories and electrocardiograms (ECGs). Twenty-six per cent of patients with a final diagnosis of MI were not correctly diagnosed on admission. Fifty-one per cent of all patients did not receive thrombolytic therapy (TT) mainly because the diagnosis was not made on admission. A smaller proportion of these patients were admitted to the coronary care unit (CCU). The consultants only correctly diagnosed an average of 7.3 of the 20 patients who were mis-diagnosed on admission and would have prescribed TT to an average of 4.3 of these 20 patients. A significant proportion of patients had a diagnosis of MI missed on admission and therefore did not receive TT. Therefore, another aid to diagnosis such as serum creatinine phosphokinase (CPK) measurement should be available as an emergency test.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wong, W., Jones, A., & Goodwin, T. J. (1994). Audit on myocardial infarction in a district general hospital: Is there room for improvement in diagnostic accuracy? Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 87(1), 22–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/014107689408700111

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free