Abstract
Background: Theories of action control emphasise the importance of planning, but plans are not universally beneficial. Purpose: The present study investigates whether the effectiveness of plans depends upon the skill of the planner. Methods: Study 1 prospectively predicted changes in unhealthy snacking behaviour over 1 week from intentions, action planning and performance on a standardised cognitive test of planning skill (n = 72). Study 2 experimentally randomised skilled and poor planners to receive (or not) a planning intervention before completing an online food diary (n = 144) Results: Spontaneously generated action plans about snacking explained significantly more variance in subsequent snacking if produced by a skilled rather than a poor planner. The planning intervention (implementation intention) significantly improved goal attainment but only in poor planners. Conclusions: Plans are only as good as the people who make them. Poor planners' plans do not help achieve goals. Planning interventions can compensate for a lack of planning skill. © 2013 The Society of Behavioral Medicine.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Allan, J. L., Sniehotta, F. F., & Johnston, M. (2013). The best laid plans: Planning skill determines the effectiveness of action plans and implementation intentions. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 46(1), 114–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-013-9483-9
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.