Cost-effectiveness of case management in substance abuse treatment

10Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study, which is part of a larger clinical trial, was to examine the cost-effectiveness of case management for individuals treated for substance abuse in a residential setting. Method: Clients who agreed to participate were randomly assigned to one of four study groups. Two groups received face-to-face case management and one telecommunication case management, and the fourth was the control group. Results: Using a ratio of cost to days free from substance abuse, the case management groups were less cost-effective than the control group at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months. The telecommunication case management was least cost-effective of the three case management conditions. Conclusion: Results from the analysis revealed case management is not cost-effective as a supplement to traditional drug treatment over a 12-month follow-up period. © 2006 Sage Publications.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Saleh, S. S., Vaughn, T., Levey, S., Fuortes, L., Uden-Holmen, T., & Hall, J. A. (2006). Cost-effectiveness of case management in substance abuse treatment. Research on Social Work Practice, 16(1), 38–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731505276408

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free