Population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling of liquid and controlled-release formulations of oxycodone in healthy volunteers

15Citations
Citations of this article
41Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Oral controlled-release formulations are playing an ever-increasing role in opioid therapy; however, little is known about their influence on the relationship between pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. The study aim was to characterize the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamics of two controlled-release tablet formulations and a liquid formulation of oxycodone in healthy, opioid-naïve volunteers, which can serve as a reference for future patient studies. A semi-double-blinded, three-way crossover study was conducted, with fifteen healthy volunteers receiving two differently designed 20 mg monophasic controlled-release oxycodone tablets and 10 mg oral solution oxycodone in a randomized order. Venous plasma concentrations and pupil diameter were determined pre-dose and 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.33, 2.66, 3, 3.33, 3.66, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12 and 24 hour post-dose. Oxycodone pharmacokinetics was best described by a two-compartment model with first-order absorption. The controlled-release formulations had an absorption lag of 0.23 hour and a slower absorption rate constant (kaCR = 0.19 hour-1) compared to the oral solution (kaSOL = 0.94 hour-1). Effects on pupil diameter were delayed relative to plasma (14 minutes half-life) for all formulations and were best described by a proportional Emax model. The plasma concentration of oxycodone at half-maximum effect was lower in males (31.1 μg/L) compared to females (52.8 μg/L; P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ladebo, L., Foster, D. J. R., Abuhelwa, A. Y., Upton, R. N., Kongstad, K. T., Drewes, A. M., … Olesen, A. E. (2020). Population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling of liquid and controlled-release formulations of oxycodone in healthy volunteers. Basic and Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, 126(3), 263–276. https://doi.org/10.1111/bcpt.13330

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free