Comparing the demonstration of freedom from Trichinella infection of domestic pigs by traditional and risk-based surveillance

16Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Traditionally, the routine artificial digestion test is applied to assess the presence of Trichinella larvae in pigs. However, this diagnostic method has a low sensitivity compared to serological tests. The results from artificial digestion tests in Switzerland were evaluated over a time period of 15 years to determine by when freedom from infection based on these data could be confirmed. Freedom was defined as a 95% probability that the prevalence of infection was below 00001%. Freedom was demonstrated after 12 years at the latest. A new risk-based surveillance approach was then developed based on serology. Risk-based surveillance was also assessed over 15 years, starting in 2010. It was shown that by using this design, the sample size could be reduced by at least a factor of 4 when compared with the traditional testing regimen, without lowering the level of confidence in the Trichinella-free status of the pig population. Copyright © 2010 Cambridge University Press.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schuppers, M. E., Frey, C. F., Gottstein, B., Stärk, K. D. C., Kihm, U., & Regula, G. (2010). Comparing the demonstration of freedom from Trichinella infection of domestic pigs by traditional and risk-based surveillance. Epidemiology and Infection, 138(9), 1242–1251. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268809991518

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free