Resource setting impacts neonatal but not maternal survival in bitches treated for dystocia: 243 cases (2015-2020)

0Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To compare maternal and fetal outcomes of dystocia managed surgically and nonsurgically at referral hospitals (RHs) versus community medicine clinics (CMCs), determine the rate of C-section, and evaluate the incidence of hypoglycemia and hypocalcemia in bitches presented with dystocia. ANIMALS Bitches presented with dystocia at 2 RHs and 2 CMCs. METHODS Information on signalment, presence of hypoglycemia and/or hypocalcemia, diagnostic imaging performed, nonsurgical and surgical interventions performed, maternal and fetal outcomes, and total cost of care was obtained from the electronic medical records of bitches presenting for dystocia between October 2015 and October 2020. Descriptive statistics were performed and outcome compared between RHs and CMCs using a Fisher exact test, with a P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhu, C., Timothy, C. L., McCobb, E., Rozanski, E. A., & Schoeffler, G. L. (2024). Resource setting impacts neonatal but not maternal survival in bitches treated for dystocia: 243 cases (2015-2020). Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 262(6), 818–824. https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.23.09.0516

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free