Aftershock modeling based on uncertain stress calculations

79Citations
Citations of this article
62Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

[1] We discuss the impact of uncertainties in computed coseismic stress perturbations on the seismicity rate changes forecasted through a rate- and state-dependent frictional model. We aim to understand how the variability of Coulomb stress changes affects the correlation between predicted and observed changes in the rate of earthquake production. We use the aftershock activity following the 1992 M7.3 Landers (California) earthquake as a case study. To accomplish these tasks, we first analyze the variability of stress changes resulting from the use of different published slip distributions. We find that the standard deviation of the uncertainty is of the same size as the absolute stress change and that their ratio, the coefficient of variation (CV), is approximately constant in space. This uncertainty has a strong impact on the forecasted aftershock activity if a rate-and-state frictional model is considered. We use the early aftershocks to invert for friction parameters and the coefficient of variation by means of the maximum likelihood method. We show that, when the uncertainties are properly taken into account, the inversion yields stable results, which fit the spatiotemporal aftershock sequence. The analysis of the 1992 Landers sequence demonstrates that accounting for realistic uncertainties in stress changes strongly improves the correlation between modeled and observed seismicity rate changes. For this sequence, we measure a friction parameter Aσn ≈ 0.017 MPa and a coefficient of stress variation CV = 0.95. Copyright 2009 by the American Geophysical Union.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hainzl, S., Enescu, B., Cocco, M., Woessner, J., Catalli, F., Wang, R., & Roth, F. (2009). Aftershock modeling based on uncertain stress calculations. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 114(5). https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JB006011

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free