In vitro susceptibility testing of topical antimicrobial agents used in pediatric burn patients: Comparison of two methods

29Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

One hundred and seventy-seven bacterial isolates obtained from pediatric burn victims were tested for in vitro susceptibility against bacitracin, silver sulfadiazine, mafenide acetate, nitrofurazone, and mupirocin by two methods: standard microbroth dilution and Nathan's agar well diffusion (NAWD), Nitrofurazone had the broadest spectrum of activity. Mupirocin was the most potent agent against methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus. Silver sulfadiazine showed activity against gram-positive organisms and higher minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values, and smaller zone sizes were seen for methicillin-resistant S. aureus and gram-negative bacilli. Bacitracin showed activity against S. aureus and Streptococcus pyogenes by the microbroth method; activity could not be assessed by NAWD. Mafenide acetate had the highest MICs for all isolates tested. Correlation between methods for all isolates tested was best for mupirocin and nitrofurazone. NAWD was labor intensive and difficult to interpret; MIC method was easy to perform and reproducible. Clinical correlation is necessary to establish breakpoints for interpretation of test results.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rodgers, G. L., Mortensen, J. E., Fisher, M. C., & Long, S. S. (1997). In vitro susceptibility testing of topical antimicrobial agents used in pediatric burn patients: Comparison of two methods. Journal of Burn Care and Rehabilitation, 18(5), 406–410. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004630-199709000-00006

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free