Posterior epidural space depth: Safety of the loss of resistance and hanging drop techniques

41Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We have compared skin to epidural space distance (SED) and tip to tip distance (TTD), a measure of posterior epidural space depth (PESD), in 40 patients with a 27-gauge Whitacre needle after identification of the epidural space using the hanging drop (HD) or loss of resistance (LOR) to air technique. After the LOR technique, TTD was found to be 2 mm greater than that after the HD technique, whereas SED was the same. We conclude that identification of the epidural space can be performed successfully with both techniques, but with a diminished risk of dural damage after LOR compared with the HD technique.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hoffmann, V. L. H., Vercauteren, M. P., Vreugde, J. P., Hans, G. H., Coppejans, H. C., & Adriaensen, H. A. (1999). Posterior epidural space depth: Safety of the loss of resistance and hanging drop techniques. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 83(5), 807–809. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/83.5.807

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free