Comparison Between Robotic and Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Performed Using Single-Port Approach

4Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Introduction: Robotic surgery is being rapidly implemented globally, and new robotic surgery techniques are being developed. The da Vinci SP surgical system, a new robotic surgery system using a single-port approach, was introduced for the first time in Japan, and its surgical results were compared with those of the conventional single-port plus one-port laparoscopic hysterectomy. Methods: The study included 20 patients who underwent single-port robotic hysterectomy using the da Vinci SP surgical system (SP-RH) between March 2023 and December 2023, and 37 patients who underwent single-port plus one-port laparoscopic hysterectomy (SP + 1-LH) between March 2018 and December 2023. The surgical outcomes and complications were retrospectively compared. Result: When the SP-RH group was compared with the SP + 1-LH group, intraoperative blood loss was observed to be significantly lower in the SP-RH group. However, no difference in the incidence of intraoperative complications between the two groups was observed. Furthermore, when comparing postoperative inflammatory responses, C-reactive protein levels were significantly lower in the SP + 1-LH group on the third day after surgery, but no other differences were observed. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that single-port robotic hysterectomy using the da Vinci SP surgical system can be safely introduced and performed in clinical settings. The da Vinci SP surgical system, which uses a single-port platform, can be used in minimally invasive surgeries as a novel operational system.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ohwaki, A., Takada, K., Kobayashi, A., Ito, M., Ichikawa, R., Miyamura, H., & Nishizawa, H. (2025). Comparison Between Robotic and Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Performed Using Single-Port Approach. Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/ases.70044

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free