“She did see warning signs but chose to ignore them”: perpetrator justification and victim-blaming narratives in true crime podcasts about intimate partner violence

14Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Prior research on the media portrayal of intimate partner violence (IPV) shows that perpetrator justification and victim-blaming narratives are common. However, no researcher has yet examined true crime podcasts for these portrayals. For this study, the researcher examined four season-long true crime podcasts about IPV for perpetrator justification and victim-blaming narratives using qualitative document analysis. Across podcasts, perpetrators were commonly presented as having mental health issues and as growing up in environments conducive to abuse and around abusive men. Alternatively, women were blamed for their victimization via descriptions of their flirtatious/sexual behavior, their decision to stay in the relationship, and their naivete about IPV or relationships. The harmful nature of these portrayals is discussed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Slakoff, D. C. (2023). “She did see warning signs but chose to ignore them”: perpetrator justification and victim-blaming narratives in true crime podcasts about intimate partner violence. Feminist Media Studies, 23(8), 4347–4363. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2023.2171086

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free