Abstract
There is a gap between the theoretical assumptions of wellbeing and its associated empirical constructs. Three measurement models (a correlated factors model, a second-order two-factor model, and a bifactor model) were analysed using a large sample of English adolescents (n = 37, 630) to test whether the theoretical separation between hedonic and eudemonic wellbeing is empirically supported, and whether there is the possibility of essential unidimensionality. Evidence of a general factor of wellbeing was found in the bifactor model, challenging the de-facto distinction often made between hedonic and eudemonic wellbeing.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Khanna, D., Black, L., Panayiotou, M., Humphrey, N., & Demkowicz, O. (2024). Conceptualising and Measuring Adolescents’ Hedonic and Eudemonic Wellbeing: Discriminant Validity and Dimensionality Concerns. Child Indicators Research, 17(2), 551–579. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-024-10106-9
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.