Abstract
This study investigated whether the child labour prevailing in the rice-growing areas of Cambodia where wealth is measure in terms of cattle, can be explain by the poverty hypothesis and wealth paradox. In order to test if these hypotheses hold in all contexts, this study presented some evidences from rural Cambodia and used a Tobit model to investigate the impact of assets such as land and cattle on child labour. While field evidence showed no significant relationship between child labour and farmland size or income, this study found an inverse U-shaped relationship between the number of cattle owned by farmers and child labour hours. These findings suggest that the poverty hypothesis and the wealth paradox do not support the evidence on child labour supply in rural Cambodia.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Seiichi, F. (2013). Child labour and wealth in rural Cambodia: Re-examination of alternative hypotheses. Journal of Development and Agricultural Economics, 5(2), 35–48. https://doi.org/10.5897/jdae11.065
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.