Comparison of the effects of core stabilization and chest mobilization exercises on lung function and chest wall expansion in stroke patients

13Citations
Citations of this article
48Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

[Purpose] The main purpose of this study was to compare the effects of core stabilization and chest mobilization exercises on pulmonary function and chest expansion in chronic stroke patients. [Subjects and Methods] Thirty stroke patients were randomly divided into two groups: a core stabilization exercise group (n=15) and a chest mobilization exercise group (n=15). Each exercise was performed 3 times per week for 30 minutes for 4 weeks, and pulmonary function and chest expansion when breathing were measured for both groups. [Results] There were significant increases in both forced vital capacity and forced expiratory volume in 1 second before and after intervention. Core stabilization exercise resulted in a significant increase in peak expiratory flow, and significant increases in upper and lower chest expansion were detected with chest mobilization exercise. However, no significant difference was revealed between the two groups. [Conclusion] This study suggested that both exercises were effective in some aspects of pulmonary function while core stabilization can help increase peak expiratory flow and chest mobilization can assist with chest expansion.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Park, S. J., Lee, J. H., & Min, K. O. (2017). Comparison of the effects of core stabilization and chest mobilization exercises on lung function and chest wall expansion in stroke patients. Journal of Physical Therapy Science, 29(7), 1144–1147. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.29.1144

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free