Comparison of tec calculations based on trimble, javad, leica, and septentrio GNSS receiver data

14Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

A Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) receiver is, to some extent, a “black box” when its data is used for ionospheric studies. Our results based on Javad, Septentrio, Trimble, and Leica GNSS receivers have proven that the accuracy of the slant Total Electron Content (TEC) calculation can differ significantly depending on the GNSS receiver type/model, because TEC measurements depend on the carrier phase tracking technique applied in a receiver. The correlation coefficient between carrier phase noise in L1 and L2 channels is considered as a possible indicator that shows if the L1-aided tracking technique or independent tracking is applied inside a receiver. An empirical model of the TEC noise component was provided to determine the TEC noise value in different types/models of GNSS receivers.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Demyanov, V., Sergeeva, M., Fedorov, M., Ishina, T., Gatica-Acevedo, V. J., & Cabral-Cano, E. (2020, October 1). Comparison of tec calculations based on trimble, javad, leica, and septentrio GNSS receiver data. Remote Sensing. MDPI AG. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12193268

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free