A comprehensive analysis of the nitrogen synchrony between cover crops release and maize uptake

2Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background and aims: Quantitative analyses of the synchrony between nitrogen (N) release from cover crops (CCs) and maize (Zea mays L.) uptake remain limited. This study aimed to i) develop a method to assess N synchrony, ii) analyze how CC species and termination dates affect N synchrony, and iii) relate N synchrony to CC characteristics, maize yield, and associated N traits. Methods: We quantified N synchrony as the percentage match between daily N release from CCs and the portion of maize N uptake not met by soil supply. This approach was used to calculate N synchrony and excess-asynchrony for three CCs [oat (Avena sativa L.), hairy vetch (HV, Vicia villosa Roth.), and an oat–HV mixture (Mix)] with two termination dates (early and late) over two seasons. Results: Nitrogen synchrony was higher in HV and Mix than in oat (81%, 70%, and 23%, respectively), and higher in late terminations (~ 1 week before maize sowing) than early terminations (~ 4 weeks before sowing) (65% vs. 51%). An N accumulation of ~ 140 kg N ha−1 in CC aboveground biomass optimized the balance between N synchrony and excess-asynchrony. N accumulation, C:N ratio, and the days between CC termination and maize sowing explained N synchrony variability (R2 ≥ 0.77). N synchrony was negatively related to maize yield response to N and positively related to N use and recovery efficiencies. Conclusion: This analysis provides insights to guide CC management for improving maize yield, optimizing N fertilization, and reducing environmental N losses.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Carciochi, W. D., Cafaro La Menza, F., Terwissen Gjerloff, D. G., Reussi Calvo, N. I., Divito, G. A., Avila Manotoa, O. R., … Barbieri, P. A. (2025). A comprehensive analysis of the nitrogen synchrony between cover crops release and maize uptake. Plant and Soil, 516(2), 1639–1653. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-025-07821-9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free