Why Are There So Few Basidiomycota and Basal Fungi as Endophytes? A Review

43Citations
Citations of this article
74Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

A review of selected studies on fungal endophytes confirms the paucity of Basidiomycota and basal fungi, with almost 90% attributed to Ascomycota. Reasons for the low number of Basidiomycota and basal fungi, including the Chytridiomycota, Mucoromycota, and Mortierellomycota, are advanced, including isolation procedure and media, incubation period and the slow growth of basidiomycetes, the identification of non-sporulating isolates, endophyte competition, and fungus–host interactions. We compare the detection of endophytes through culture-dependent methods and culture-independent methods, the role of fungi on senescence of the host plant, and next-generation studies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rungjindamai, N., & Jones, E. B. G. (2024, January 1). Why Are There So Few Basidiomycota and Basal Fungi as Endophytes? A Review. Journal of Fungi. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI). https://doi.org/10.3390/jof10010067

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free