Abstract
Background: The prevalence of reaches up to 5% in women younger than 40 years. There-fore, the fertility preservation should be the goal of the clinical practice in women with desire of pregnancy and low-risk features. The aim of this study is to compare oncological and reproductive outcomes of different hormonal therapies in FST of EC. Methods: A retrospective single-center study recruiting patients with presumed FIGO STAGE IA endometrioid G1 EC from 2005 to 2020 was performed. We assessed outcomes for three different therapeutic options: GnRHa + LNG-IUD vs. MA + LNG-IUD vs. MA + LNG-IUD + MET. Results: In total, 75 patients were enrolled and followed up for a median of 45 months. Complete response (CR) was achieved in 75% of patients at 12 months. Although not statistically significant, we reported an increasing rate of CR from the regimen with GnRHa to the one with MA + MET (65% vs. 83%). We showed a statistically significant lower risk of recurrence in women treated with MA + LNG-IUD + MET, when compared to GnRHa + LNG-IUD regimen. The pregnancy rate was 74% and live birth rate was 42%, with no differences among regimens. Conclusions: FST is a safe and effective option in women who desire to preserve fertility.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Pino, I., Iacobone, A. D., Urbinati, A. M. V., Di Giminiani, M., Radice, D., Guerrieri, M. E., … Franchi, D. (2022). Fertility-Sparing Treatment for Endometrial Cancer: Oncological and Obstetric Outcomes in Combined Therapies with Levonorgestrel Intrauterine Device. Cancers, 14(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14092170
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.