Nitrogen mineralization and availability in manure composts from Quebec biological farms

30Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The real contribution of composts to N availability depends on their characteristics and maturity. A laboratory incubation experiment (140 d) was conducted parallel to a greenhouse study (330 d) in a split-split-plot design, with, respectively, two peat rates (0, 20 g kg-1 soil), five manure composts and four compost rates (0, 250, 500 and 750 g kg-1 soil). Compost N mineralization, orchardgrass (Dactylis Glomerata L.) yield and N Uptake were measured. Total amount of mineralized N and yields and N uptake for six cuts of orchardgrass varied significantly with the type of composts and rate. Peat addition temporarily decreased compost N mineralization rate but significantly increased orchardgrass yields and N uptake as compared to peatless treatments. Mineralized N represented <3% of total N, whereas N uptake by orchardgrass represented 13-40% of total N among composts. This low mineralized N value compared to total N and total N uptake was due to a high maturity of the composts studied. This was shown by high humic acid: fulvic acid fraction ratios (3.1 to 4.8) and low nonhumic fraction:humic acid+fulvic acid ratios (0.10 to 0. 12), as well as low C/N ratios, high bulk density, high ash content, pH, NO3-N and CEC values. Even if peat addition decreased mineralized N basically due to temporary N immobilization, its application significantly increased yields and N uptake probably by improving physical conditions in soil-manure compost mixtures. Peat addition to mature manure composts should be considered as an interesting alternative for horticultural plants sensitive to high NO3-N content from mature composts.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

N’Dayegamiye, A., Royer, R., & Audesse, P. (1997). Nitrogen mineralization and availability in manure composts from Quebec biological farms. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 77(3), 345–350. https://doi.org/10.4141/S96-004

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free