Biomechanical comparison of a single-row versus double-row suture anchor technique for rotator cuff repair

423Citations
Citations of this article
166Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background:Reestablishment of the native footprint during rotator cuff repair has been suggested as an important criterion for optimizing healing potential and fixation strength. Hypothesis:A double-row rotator cuff footprint repair will demonstrate superior biomechanical properties compared with a single-row repair. Study Design:Controlled laboratory study. Methods:In 9 matched pairs of fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders, the supraspinatus tendon from 1 shoulder was repaired with a double-row suture anchor technique: 2 medial anchors with horizontal mattress sutures and 2 lateral anchors with simple sutures. The tendon from the contralateral shoulder was repaired using a single lateral row of 2 anchors with simple sutures. Each specimen underwent cyclic loading from 10 to 180 N for 200 cycles, followed by tensile testing to failure. Gap formation and strain over the footprint area were measured using a video digitizing system; stiffness and failure load were determined from testing machine data. Results:Gap formation for the double-row repair was significantly smaller (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kim, D. H., ElAttrache, N. S., Tibone, J. E., Jun, B. J., DeLaMora, S. N., Kvitne, R. S., & Lee, T. Q. (2006). Biomechanical comparison of a single-row versus double-row suture anchor technique for rotator cuff repair. American Journal of Sports Medicine, 34(3), 407–414. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546505281238

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free