Male circumcision reduces penile hpv incidence and persistence: A randomized controlled trial in Kenya

14Citations
Citations of this article
50Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Male circumcision reduces the risk of human immunodeficiency virus infection in men. We assessed the effect of male circumcision on the incidence and natural history of human papillomavirus (HPV) in a randomized clinical trial in Kisumu, Kenya. Methods: Sexually active, 18- to 24-year-old men provided penile exfoliated cells for HPV DNA testing every 6 months for 2 years. HPV DNA was detected via GP5þ/6þ PCR in glans/coronal sulcus and in shaft samples. HPV incidence and persistence were assessed by intent-to-treat analyses. Results: A total of 2,193 men participated (1,096 randomized to circumcision; 1,097 controls). HPV prevalence was 50% at baseline for both groups and dropped to 23.7% at 24 months in the circumcision group, and 41.0% in control group. Incident infection of any HPV type over 24 months was lower among men in the circumcision group than in the control group [HR ¼ 0.61; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.52-0.72]. Clearance rate of any HPV infection over 24 months was higher in the circumcision group than in the control group (HR ¼ 1.87; 95% CI, 1.49-2.34). Lower HPV point-prevalence, lower HPV incidence, and higher HPV clearance in the circumcision group were observed in glans but not in shaft samples. Conclusion: Male circumcision reduced the risk of HPV acquisition and reinfection, and increased HPV clearance in the glans. Impact: Providing voluntary, safe, and affordable male circumcision should help reduce HPV infections in men, and consequently, HPV-associated disease in their partners.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Smith, J. S., Backes, D. M., Hudgens, M. G., Mei, W., Chakraborty, H., Rohner, E., … Bailey, R. C. (2021). Male circumcision reduces penile hpv incidence and persistence: A randomized controlled trial in Kenya. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention, 30(6), 1139–1148. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-20-1272

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free