Fe-Mg order-disorder in tremolite-actinolite-ferro-actinolite at ambient and high temperature

39Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The crystal structures and M-site populations of a series of unheated and heat-treated, near-binary members of the actinolite series were determined from single-crystal X-ray diffraction data. Small, systematic differences in crystal structure (mean and individual bond lengths, octahedral distortions, and Mg-Fe site preferences) between the actinolite and cummingtonite series are documented and rationalized in terms of the bond-valence model. Mg-Fe2+ site preferences among the M1, M2 and M3 sites in the actinolite series are small. Between M1 and M3, site preference (Fe2+ slightly in favor of M1) is independent of temperature. Mg is favored in M2 over M1 in unheated samples (less strongly than cummingtonite-grunerite), but Fe2+ and Mg are virtually disordered samples re-equilibrated at 700°C. Site preference between M2 and M3 and possibly also between M1 and M2 appears to undergo a reversal as a result of heat treatment, but consideration of all sources of error renders this conclusion a tentative one, although the observation could be explained in terms of a bond valence deficiency. The ratio of Fe2+/Mg atoms on M4 cannot be accurately determined, but refinements indicate that, like cummingtonite-grunerite, it is larger than on all other M sites. Expansion of the cell dimensions with an increase in Fe/Mg ratio follows a pattern similar to that of thermal expansion, and a and β are influenced by cummingtonite-grunerite solid solution. The data are consistent with a cell volume of 942.8 Å3 (or molar volume of 2.8388 J/bar) for end-member ferro-actinolite, a first approximation that assumes a reciprocal, quadrilateral ΔV of zero.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Evans, B. W., & Hexiong Yang. (1998). Fe-Mg order-disorder in tremolite-actinolite-ferro-actinolite at ambient and high temperature. American Mineralogist, 83(5–6), 458–475. https://doi.org/10.2138/am-1998-5-606

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free