Abstract
Objective: Growing evidence is highlighting the inefficacy of clindamycin as an effective substitute to amoxicillin in patients self-reporting a penicillin allergy. The hypothesis is that implant failure is higher in these patients, when compared to patients receiving penicillin. To test this hypothesis, a systematic review and meta-analysis was undertaken and a protocol for delabeling penicillin allergic patients was presented. Materials and Methods: A systematic review was undertaken by searching across three different databases, namely PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science. Results: Out of 572 results, four studies were eligible to be included. Fixed-effects meta-analysis showed a higher number of failed implants in patients who were administered clindamycin, because of a self-reported allergy to penicillin. Results showed that these patients are over three times more likely (OR = 3.30, 95% C.I. 2.58–4.22, p-value
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Edibam, N. R., Lorenzo-Pouso, A. I., & Caponio, V. C. A. (2023, July 1). Self-reported allergy to penicillin and clindamycin administration may be risk factors for dental implant failure: A systematic review, meta-analysis and delabeling protocol. Clinical Oral Implants Research. John Wiley and Sons Inc. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.14073
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.