Anatomic and functional leg-length inequality: A review and recommendation for clinical decision-making. Part I, anatomic leg-length inequality: Prevalence, magnitude, effects and clinical significance

158Citations
Citations of this article
314Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Leg-length inequality is most often divided into two groups: anatomic and functional. Part I of this review analyses data collected on anatomic leg-length inequality relative to prevalence, magnitude, effects and clinical significance. Part II examines the functional "short leg" including anatomic-functional relationships, and provides an outline for clinical decision-making. Methods: Online database - Medline, CINAHL and MANTIS - and library searches for the time frame of 1970-2005 were done using the term "leg-length inequality". Results and Discussion: Using data on leg-length inequality obtained by accurate and reliable x-ray methods, the prevalence of anatomic inequality was found to be 90%, the mean magnitude of anatomic inequality was 5.2 mm (SD 4.1). The evidence suggests that, for most people, anatomic leg-length inequality does not appear to be clinically significant until the magnitude reaches ∼ 20 mm (∼3/4"). Conclusion: Anatomic leg-length inequality is near universal, but the average magnitude is small and not likely to be clinically significant. © 2005 Knutson; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Knutson, G. A. (2005, July 20). Anatomic and functional leg-length inequality: A review and recommendation for clinical decision-making. Part I, anatomic leg-length inequality: Prevalence, magnitude, effects and clinical significance. Chiropractic and Osteopathy. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-1340-13-11

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free