The baryonic Tully-Fisher relation cares about the galaxy sample

14Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The baryonic Tully-Fisher relation (BTFR) is a clear manifestation of the underlying physics of galaxy formation. As such, it is used to constrain and test galaxy formation and evolution models. Of particular interest, apart from the slope of the relation, is its intrinsic scatter. In this article, we use the eagle simulation to study the dependence of the BTFR on the size of the simulated galaxy sample. The huge number of data points available in the simulation is indeed not available with current observations. Observational studies that computed the BTFR used various (small) size samples, with the only obligation to have galaxies spanning a large range of masses and rotation rates. Accordingly, to compare observational and theoretical results, we build a large number of various size data sets using the same criterion and derive the BTFR for all of them. Unmistakably, there is an effect resulting from the number of galaxies used to derive the relation. The smaller the number, the larger the standard deviation around the average slope and intrinsic scatter of a given size sample of galaxies. This observation allows us to alleviate the tensions between observational measurements and ΛCDM predictions. Namely, the size of the observational samples adds up to the complexity in comparing observed and simulated relations to discredit or confirm ΛCDM. Similarly, samples, even large, that do not reflect the galaxy distribution give biased results on average. Large size samples reproducing the underlying distribution of galaxies constitute a supplementary necessity to compare observations and simulations efficiently.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sorce, J. G., & Guo, Q. (2016). The baryonic Tully-Fisher relation cares about the galaxy sample. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 458(3), 2667–2675. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw341

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free