Sensitivity of quantitative precipitation forecasts to boundary layer parameterization: A flash flood case study in the Western Mediterranean

58Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The "Montserrat-2000" severe flash flood event which occurred over Catalonia on 9 and 10 June 2000 is analyzed. Strong precipitation was generated by a mesoscale convective system associated with the development of a cyclone. The location of heavy precipitation depends on the position of the cyclone, which, in turn, is found to be very sensitive to various model characteristics and initial conditions. Nume rical simulations of this case study using the hydrostatic BOLAM and the non-hydrostatic MOLOCH models are performed in order to test the effects of different formulations of the boundary layer parameterization: a modified version of the Louis (order 1) model and a custom version of the E-ℓ (order 1.5) model. Both of them require a diagnostic formulation of the mixing length, but the use of the turbulent kinetic energy equation in the E-ℓ model allows to represent turbulence history and non-locality effects and to formulate a more physically based mixing length. The impact of the two schemes is different in the two models. The hydrostatic model, run at 1/5 degree resolution, is less sensitive, but the quantitative precipitation forecast is in any case unsatisfactory in terms of localization and amount. Conversely, the non-hydrostatic model, run at 1/50 degree resolution, is capable of realistically simulate timing, position and amount of precipitation, with the apparently superior results obtained with the E-ℓ parameterization model. European Geosciences Union © 2005 Author(s). This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zampieri, M., Malguzzi, P., & Buzzi, A. (2005). Sensitivity of quantitative precipitation forecasts to boundary layer parameterization: A flash flood case study in the Western Mediterranean. Natural Hazards and Earth System Science, 5(4), 603–612. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-5-603-2005

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free