Further validation of the questionnaire for eudaimonic well-being (QEWB)

  • Schutte L
  • Wissing M
  • Khumalo I
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
114Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to explore the structural and external validity of the recently developed Questionnaire for Eudaimonic Well-Being (QEWB), scrutinising the parcelling approach used by Waterman and colleagues to confirm the unidimensional structure of the scale. Method: A multicultural South African student sample (n = 325) was used. Parceland item-level confirmatory factor analysis and item-level exploratory factor analysis were conducted to explore the scale’s structural validity. External validity was examined via attenuation corrected correlations with scores on criterion measures. Results: On parcel-level a one-dimensional structure fitted well, but since the assumption of unidimensional parcels was violated, the use of parcelling was contraindicated. Item-level analyses revealed a multidimensional factor structure. The scale showed good convergent and discriminant validity. Conclusions: The QEWB shows potential for future use, given that the multidimensionality of the scale is acknowledged. Some items may need revision.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schutte, L., Wissing, M. P., & Khumalo, I. P. (2013). Further validation of the questionnaire for eudaimonic well-being (QEWB). Psychology of Well-Being, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/2211-1522-3-3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free