Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to explore the structural and external validity of the recently developed Questionnaire for Eudaimonic Well-Being (QEWB), scrutinising the parcelling approach used by Waterman and colleagues to confirm the unidimensional structure of the scale. Method: A multicultural South African student sample (n = 325) was used. Parceland item-level confirmatory factor analysis and item-level exploratory factor analysis were conducted to explore the scale’s structural validity. External validity was examined via attenuation corrected correlations with scores on criterion measures. Results: On parcel-level a one-dimensional structure fitted well, but since the assumption of unidimensional parcels was violated, the use of parcelling was contraindicated. Item-level analyses revealed a multidimensional factor structure. The scale showed good convergent and discriminant validity. Conclusions: The QEWB shows potential for future use, given that the multidimensionality of the scale is acknowledged. Some items may need revision.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Schutte, L., Wissing, M. P., & Khumalo, I. P. (2013). Further validation of the questionnaire for eudaimonic well-being (QEWB). Psychology of Well-Being, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/2211-1522-3-3
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.