FISH analysis of Lactobacillus biofilms in the gastrointestinal tract of different hosts

48Citations
Citations of this article
90Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Aims: To investigate the spatial organization of endogenous and exogenously applied Lactobacillus communities at specific locations in the adult gastrointestinal tract of different hosts. Methods and Results: Samples of the human, murine and avian gastrointestinal tract of subjects that received or not received a Lactobacillus probiotic were analysed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with rRNA-targeted probes. High levels of endogenous lactobacilli were observed on the nonsecretory, stratified squamous epithelia present in the forestomach of mice and crop of chickens, respectively. These epithelial associations showed characteristics of bacterial biofilms, i.e. bacteria attached to a surface and embedded in a matrix of extracellular polymeric substances. In other regions of the analysed intestines, lactobacilli seemed to occur mainly as dispersed bacterial cells or as microcolonies. Exogenous administration of a Lactobacillus probiotic did increase the levels of loosely adherent Lactobacillus cells detected. However, the probiotic strains were unable to establish themselves inside the gastrointestinal biofilms. Conclusions: Gastrointestinal biofilms of lactobacilli occur only in specific niches in certain hosts, such as the murine forestomach and avian crop. Significance and Impact of the Study: Biofilm formation by lactobacilli in specific parts of animal gastrointestinal tracts was documented for the first time by FISH. © 2011 The Authors. Letters in Applied Microbiology © 2011 The Society for Applied Microbiology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lebeer, S., Verhoeven, T. L. A., Claes, I. J. J., De Hertogh, G., Vermeire, S., Buyse, J., … De Keersmaecker, S. C. J. (2011). FISH analysis of Lactobacillus biofilms in the gastrointestinal tract of different hosts. Letters in Applied Microbiology, 52(3), 220–226. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-765X.2010.02994.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free