Comparison of myocardial perfusion82Rb PET performed with CT- and transmission CT-based attenuation correction

37Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

CT-based attenuation correction (AC) for myocardial perfusion PET studies is challenging because of respiratory motion. Our study aimed to compare the transmission CT (TCT)-based and CT-based AC for myocardial perfusion PET/CT images with a direct semi-quantitative approach comparing differences in segmental count distribution. Methods: Stress and rest 82Rb PET scans from 54 consecutive patients acquired on a PET/CT scanner with dual CT-based and TCT-based AC were considered. TCT- and CT-based AC images were automatically registered to each other, and direct voxel-based and American Heart Association segment-based estimation of positive and negative changes between these scans was performed. Additionally, visual quality control (QC) of CT map alignment with PET emission data was performed by 2 expert observers, and studies with significant (≥5 mm) misalignment were reprocessed with corrected CT alignment. Results: We used the 17-segment American Heart Association model for TCT-to-CT regional change analysis in all patients and found that 4 segments on rest and 4 segments on stress scans differedmore than 3% between CT- and TCT-corrected images for studies without significant misalignments (<5 mm); only 1 differed by more than 5%. In cases with significant misalignment of greater than or equal to 3% TCT-CT AC, changes were observed on 14 rest and 10 stress segments; after alignment, these differences were still seen in 13 rest segments and 11 stress segments. Visual QC revealed that 46% of rest and 54% of stress PET scans were misaligned by greater than or equal to 5 mm with the CT maps acquired during normal breathing. The range of the reported PET/CT misalignment was 0-15 mm in x, 0-16 mm in y, and 0-20 mm in z directions. The overall agreement in visual QC of PET/CT alignment between the observers was 72.2% Conclusion: There are significant differences between TCT and CT AC applied to cardiac PET/CT studies, which remain after alignment of CT maps to emission data. Copyright © 2008 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Slomka, P. J., Le Meunier, L., Hayes, S. W., Acampa, W., Oba, M., Haemer, G. G., … Germano, G. (2008). Comparison of myocardial perfusion82Rb PET performed with CT- and transmission CT-based attenuation correction. Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 49(12), 1992–1998. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.108.056580

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free