Point-of-care and traditional erythrocyte sedimentation rate, point-of-care rheometry, and cell-free DNA concentration in dogs with or without systemic inflammation

2Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

RBC aggregation and deformability characteristics are altered by inflammatory, microcirculatory, and hemorheologic disease. These changes can be indirectly evaluated using the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). Newer point-of-care devices employ syllectometry to evaluate RBC rheology, which can give information beyond the ESR. We evaluated 2 point-of-care rheometers (iSED and MIZAR; Alcor Scientific) in 52 dogs presented to a university teaching hospital. Whole blood samples were analyzed for correlation between the ESR using the Westergren (ESRw) method (measured at 1 h and 24 h) and the predicted ESR using iSED. Plasma fibrinogen and cell-free DNA concentrations were also measured as probable markers of inflammation. The iSED-predicted ESR was positively correlated to the ESRw method at 1 h (r = 0.74; p < 0.001) and 24 h (r = 0.62; p < 0.001). Comparing dogs with or without inflammation (defined as plasma fibrinogen concentration >3.5 g/L [350 mg/dL]), significant differences were seen in the MIZAR parameters of base point, amplitude, integral, and half-time. Median cell-free DNA concentrations were higher in the group of dogs with inflammation (117 [range: 51–266] ng/mL vs. 82.7 [range: 19–206] ng/mL; p = 0.024). The iSED-predicted ESR is a good predictor of the ESRw and was obtained more rapidly. Rheometric parameters measured by MIZAR may be useful in detecting inflammation and monitoring secondary morphologic and functional changes in canine RBCs.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Clarkin-Breslin, R. C., & Brainard, B. M. (2024). Point-of-care and traditional erythrocyte sedimentation rate, point-of-care rheometry, and cell-free DNA concentration in dogs with or without systemic inflammation. Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation, 36(2), 177–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/10406387241226971

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free