Abstract
Sustainability targets in contemporary construction projects are increasingly defined through embodied carbon limits, circular material obligations, waste diversion benchmarks, and energy performance requirements. However, a persistent gap remains between the establishment of these commitments during policy and design stages and their effective verification throughout project delivery and post-handover operation. Although Building Information Modelling (BIM), digital twins, and associated digital monitoring systems are widely discussed in sustainable construction research, their collective role in enabling continuous sustainability compliance assurance within construction management remains insufficiently synthesised. This study addresses this gap through a PRISMA-guided systematic review and structured comparative thematic synthesis of 117 peer-reviewed studies published between 2016 and 2026. A structured analytical coding matrix, MMAT-informed methodological quality appraisal, and descriptive evidence mapping were used to evaluate dominant digital technologies, sustainability compliance domains, lifecycle verification gaps, and study validation approaches. The findings indicate that current research remains concentrated around BIM-enabled design modelling and isolated operational analytics, with comparatively limited attention to integrated multi-stage sustainability verification during procurement, construction, commissioning, and operation. Four recurring sustainability compliance domains requiring stronger construction management control are identified, including embodied carbon verification, material reuse traceability, waste diversion monitoring, and energy performance validation. In response, the study proposes a Digital Sustainability Compliance Framework that conceptually integrates sustainability targets, PMBOK-aligned project control functions, BIM information models, digital twins, sensor systems, and centralised construction data platforms within a continuous lifecycle verification architecture. The study repositions digital technologies as governance-oriented infrastructures for more transparent, auditable, and continuously monitored sustainability compliance assurance while highlighting the need for future empirical validation.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Haigh, R., Chan, M., & Yang, W. (2026, June 1). Digital Technologies for Lifecycle Sustainability Compliance Verification in Construction Management: A Systematic Review and Governance Framework. Buildings. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI). https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16112113
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.