A registry of nationally appropriate mitigation actions: Goals, outcomes, and institutional requisites

12Citations
Citations of this article
39Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This article examines key issues in operationalizing a registry of nationally appropriate mitigation actions (NAMAs) undertaken by developing countries party to the United Nations framework convention on climate change. It analyzes goals, outcomes, and institutional prerequisites underlying various proposals to determine how a NAMA mechanism could work in international climate cooperation. The different proposals for how NAMA shall be designed relate to three basic effort-sharing arrangements in a future climate regime: binding commitments for all Parties, purely voluntary commitments for all, and legally binding commitments for Annex I countries but voluntary ones for others. We conclude that a NAMA registry could be designed so as initially to suit all three types of effort-sharing regimes. The article identifies three areas of potential common ground in a registry irrespective of effort-sharing type: the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities, the sustainable development objectives of the Convention, and the need for a systemic transition toward low-carbon energy technologies. © Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences 2012.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Linnér, B. O., & Pahuja, N. (2012). A registry of nationally appropriate mitigation actions: Goals, outcomes, and institutional requisites. Ambio, 41(SUPPL.1), 56–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-011-0241-6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free