Kajian Pendekatan Simultan Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Konvensional dengan CAMELS dan RGEC

  • Octafilia Y
  • Wiyaja E
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study aims to analyze conventional health bank level by using CAMELS and RGEC methods. This is descriptive research of quantitative approach with conventional banks as samples as fifty banks from 2012 to 2017. The  results of this study shows that ratios of CAMELS method are in from 1 to 3 composite level mostly where CAR, NIM, BOPO are in very good condition and ROA, NPM, LDR, ROE are in quite good condition. Then, in RGEC method, conventional health bank level has value from 1 to 5 composite level commonly where CAR, NIM, BOPO are in very adequate condition and NPL, IRR tend to show quite adequate condition while GCG tends to show unadequate condition. Finally, conventional helth bank level by using CAMELS and RGEC methods are in composite level between 1-3 mostly. It means that conventional health bank level of  Indonesia in very good or very adequate and quite good or quite adequate condition. Keywords : Banking Health Level, Conventional, CAMELS, RGEC

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Octafilia, Y., & Wiyaja, E. (2019). Kajian Pendekatan Simultan Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Konvensional dengan CAMELS dan RGEC. Journal of Economic, Bussines and Accounting (COSTING), 3(1), 160–174. https://doi.org/10.31539/costing.v3i1.839

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free