Quantifying the Expanding Landscape of Clinical Actionability for Patients with Cancer

53Citations
Citations of this article
107Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

There is a continuing debate about the proportion of cancer patients that benefit from precision oncology, attributable in part to conflicting views as to which molecular alterations are clinically actionable. To quantify the expansion of clinical actionability since 2017, we annotated 47,271 solid tumors sequenced with the MSK-IMPACT clinical assay using two temporally distinct versions of the OncoKB knowledge base deployed 5 years apart. Between 2017 and 2022, we observed an increase from 8.9% to 31.6% in the fraction of tumors harboring a standard care (level 1 or 2) predictive biomarker of therapy response and an almost halving of tumors carrying non-actionable drivers (44.2% to 22.8%). In tumors with limited or no clinical actionability, TP53 (43.2%), KRAS (19.2%), and CDKN2A (12.2%) were the most frequently altered genes. SIGNIFICANCE: Although clear progress has been made in expanding the availability of precision oncology-based treatment paradigms, our results suggest a continued unmet need for innovative therapeutic strategies, particularly for cancers with currently undruggable oncogenic drivers.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Suehnholz, S. P., Nissan, M. H., Zhang, H., Kundra, R., Nandakumar, S., Lu, C., … Chakravarty, D. (2024). Quantifying the Expanding Landscape of Clinical Actionability for Patients with Cancer. Cancer Discovery, 14(1), 49–65. https://doi.org/10.1158/2159-8290.CD-23-0467

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free