ANTIMICROBIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY OF 51 CAMPYLOBACTER STRAINS ISOLATED FROM DIARRHEIC AND DIARRHEA-FREE DOGS

  • Modolo J
  • Giuffrida R
  • Lopes C
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

ABSTRACT The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined by agar dilution for six antimicrobial agents (cephalexin, eythromycin, gentamicin, enrofloxacin, chloramphenicol, and oxytetracyline) using 51 Campylobacter strains (29 Campylobacter jejuni subsp. jejuni, 14 Campylobacter jejuni subsp doylei, 5 Campylobacter upsaliensis, 2 Campylobacter coli, and 1 Campylobacter lari) isolated from 29 diarrheic and 22 diarrhea-free dogs. Percentages corresponding to 50% and 90% strain inhibition (MIC 50% and MIC 90%) were determined. The results show that erythromycin, enrofloxacin, and gentamicin can be recommended for the treatment of campylobacteriosis in dogs; this opens the possibility of their therapeutic use in human medicine.RESUMO As concentrações inibitórias mínimas de seis antimicrobianos (cefalexina, eritromicina, gentamicina, enrofloxacina, cloranfenicol e oxitetraciclina) para 51 estirpes de Campylobacter (29 de Campylobacter jejuni subsp. jejuni, 14 de Campylobacter jejuni subsp doylei, 5 de Campylobacter upsaliensis, 2 de Campylobacter coli e 1 de Campylobacter lari), isoladas de 29 cães com diarréia e 22 cães sem diarréia foram determinadas pelo método de diluição em ágar. Foram determinadas as percentagens correspondentes à inibição de 50% e 90% das estirpes isoladas (CIM 50% e CIM 90%). De acordo com os resultados, a eritromicina, a enrofloxacina e a gentamicina podem ser recomendadas como drogas de eleição para o tratamento da campilobacteriose em cães, ampliando também as possibilidades terapêuticas para o uso em medicina humana.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Modolo, J. R., Giuffrida, R., & Lopes, C. A. de M. (2003). ANTIMICROBIAL SUSCEPTIBILITY OF 51 CAMPYLOBACTER STRAINS ISOLATED FROM DIARRHEIC AND DIARRHEA-FREE DOGS. Arquivos Do Instituto Biológico, 70(3), 283–286. https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-1657v70p2832003

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free