Responses to COVID-19 in the Context of Quality Assurance, Quality Improvement and Scholarship Requirements for Curricula

0Citations
Citations of this article
54Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Our Curriculum Evaluation and Research-STEM Teaching Fellowship embeds leadership for active engagement in scholarship within teaching teams. It is a response to Higher Education Standards Framework (HESF) minimum requirements for continuous evaluation informing ongoing curriculum transformation, specifically the TEQSA Guidance Note: Scholarship (2018). The Fellowship contextualised the existing ‘Curriculum Evaluation Research (CER) framework' (Kelder & Carr, 2017) for the specific characteristics of STEM degrees and teaching teams. The framework supports team-based planning and doing activities that are aligned with institutional structures, processes and governance instruments, so that scholarship can be made visible, monitored, measured, met and reported at the level of degree curriculum. Here we describe fellowship outcomes in the context of responses to COVID-19 using a case study at the University of Tasmania.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Acuña, T., & Kelder, J. A. (2021). Responses to COVID-19 in the Context of Quality Assurance, Quality Improvement and Scholarship Requirements for Curricula. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 29(3), 75–87. https://doi.org/10.30722/IJISME.29.03.006

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free