Foucault and Beyond: From Sovereignty Powerto Contemporary Biopolitics

  • Vitales H
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this paper, I will provide an interpretation of Foucauldian theoretical understanding on natures of power from sovereign power to biopolitics. In order to give further depth and texture to what he means by biopolitics, I will attempt to connect biopolitics with his earlier work Discipline and Punish. The term ‘biopolitics’ was actually mentioned by Foucault on the last chapter of his History of Sexuality Volume 1: An Introduction, where he also claimed it as a technology of power linked to biopower. Foucault wrote that the highest function of biopolitics is not to kill, but to invest life through and through in the machineries of production. If that is the case, then, biopolitics aims to ensure the longevity, health, and wellness of the social bodies. However, if biopolitics is the politics that safeguard life, how come that the innumerable individuals are situated in dire condition? To answer this question, the work of Antonio Negri and Michael Hardt will be used to understand further the nature of biopolitics and its effects in the social terrain specially in the contemporary society.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vitales, H. M. (2022). Foucault and Beyond: From Sovereignty Powerto Contemporary Biopolitics. Mabini Review, 9(2020), 161–178. https://doi.org/10.70922/fs2xek52

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free