Abstract
In his recent article “Against Divine Truthmaker Simplicity,” Noël Saenz has provided two careful arguments for the falsity of a theory of divine simplicity which he dubs “Divine Truthmaker Simplicity.” In this brief response, I criticize his two arguments, arguing that neither is sound.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
APA
Pawl, T. (2019, January 1). In defense of divine truthmaker simplicity. Res Philosophica. Saint Louis University. https://doi.org/10.11612/resphil.1754
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.
Already have an account? Sign in
Sign up for free