Historical Prospective: Boltzmann's versus Planck's State Counting - Why Boltzmann Did Not Arrive at Planck's Distribution Law

4Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Why does Planck (1900), referring to Boltzmann's 1877 probabilistic treatment, obtain his quantum distribution function while Boltzmann did not? To answer this question, both treatments are compared on the basis of Boltzmann's 1868 three-level scheme (configuration - occupation - occupancy). Some calculations by Planck (1900, 1901, and 1913) and Einstein (1907) are also sketched. For obtaining a quantum distribution, it is crucial to stick with a discrete energy spectrum and to make the limit transitions to infinity at the right place. For correct state counting, the concept of interchangeability of particles is superior to that of indistinguishability.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Enders, P. (2016). Historical Prospective: Boltzmann’s versus Planck’s State Counting - Why Boltzmann Did Not Arrive at Planck’s Distribution Law. Journal of Thermodynamics. Hindawi Publishing Corporation. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/9137926

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free