Mobility and threshold-voltage comparison between (110)- and (100)-oriented ultrathin-body silicon MOSFETs

59Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Mobility and threshold-voltage (Vth) behaviour in (110) and (100) ultrathin body (UTB) n- and p-MOSFETs are experimentally examined, and performance is compared between (110) and (100) UTB CMOSFETs based on the estimated propagation delay time. Out-of-plane effective mass (mz) is the key parameter that causes the difference in mobility and Vth behavior between (110) and (100). Large Vth increase and monotonic mobility degradation, as a decrease of the silicon-on-insulator (SOI) thickness, are observed in (110) UTB nMOSFETs due to a smaller mz than (100). Mobility enhancement in (100) UTB double-gate (DG) pMOSFETs is demonstrated, which may be attributable to volume inversion. Propagation delay time is estimated based on the measured mobility, and delay is improved by 30% in (110) UTB DG CMOSFETs compared to conventional bulk CMOSFETs. © 2006 IEEE.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tsutsui, G., & Hiramoto, T. (2006). Mobility and threshold-voltage comparison between (110)- and (100)-oriented ultrathin-body silicon MOSFETs. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, 53(10), 2582–2588. https://doi.org/10.1109/TED.2006.882397

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free