Interrater reliability of the ovarian–adnexal reporting and data system magnetic resonance imaging (O‑RADS MRI)

Abstract

Aim: The current study aims to evaluate interrater reliability of ovarian–adnexal reporting and data system (O-RADS) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in interpretation of adnexal and ovarian lesions. Material and methods: Retrospective analysis of 131 ovarian lesions was as done for 106 consecutive female patients with adnexal and/or ovarian lesions that underwent MR imaging of the pelvis. Images interpretation was accomplished by two-blinded independent raters for cystic and solid parts of ovarian lesions. The score was 5 types classified pursuant to O-RADS. Results: A perfect interrater agreement regarding overall O-RADS [Kappa: 0.874, P: 0.001]. There was a perfect interrater agreement of the solid component (Kappa: 0.979, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.938–1.0, P: 0.001), enhancement degree relative to myometrium (Kappa: 0.876, 95% CI 0.781–0.971, P: 0.001) and entirely solid lesions (Kappa: 1.0, 95% CI 1.0–1.0, P: 0.001). A perfect interrater agreement for ORADS 1 (Kappa: 0.937, P: 0.001), ORADS 2 (Kappa: 0.983, P: 0.001), ORADS 3 (Kappa: 0.834, P: 0.001), ORADS 4 (Kappa: 0.827, P: 0.001) and ORADS 5 (Kappa: 0.963, P: 0.001) was present. Conclusions: The O-RADS MRI scoring system has better characterization of adnexal masses with high interrater agreement. Overcoming limitations of this study, O-RADS, may be suggested as a basic system in assessment of adnexal masses.