Tidal Flow Asymmetry Owing to Inertia and Waves on an Unstratified, Shallow Ebb Shoal

10Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Observations of water levels, waves, currents, and bathymetry collected for a month at an unstratified tidal inlet with a shallow (1 to 2 m deep) ebb shoal are used to evaluate the asymmetry in flows and dynamics owing to inertia and waves. Along-channel currents ranged from −1.5 to 0.6 m/s (positive inland) inside the main (3 to 5 m deep) channel crossing the ebb shoal. Net discharge is negligible, and ebb dominance of the channel flows is owing to inflow and outflow asymmetries near the inlet mouth. Offshore wave heights ranged from 0.5 to 2.5 m. During moderate to large wave events (offshore significant wave heights >1.2 m), wave forcing enhanced onshore mass flux near the shoal edge and inside the inlet, leading to reduced ebb flow dominance. Momentum balances estimated with the water depths, currents, and waves simulated with a quasi 3-D numerical model reproduce the momentum balances estimated from the observations reasonably well. Both observations and simulations suggest that ebb-dominant bottom stresses are balanced by the ebb-dominant pressure gradient and the tidally asymmetric inertia, which is a sink (source) of momentum on flood (ebb). Simulations with and without waves suggest that waves drive local and nonlocal changes in the water levels and flows. Specifically, breaking waves at the offshore edge of the ebb shoal induce setup and partially block the ebb jet (local effects), which leads to a more onshore-directed mass flux, changes to the advection across the ebb shoal, and increased water levels inside the inlet mouth (nonlocal effects).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wargula, A., Raubenheimer, B., Elgar, S., Chen, J. L., Shi, F., & Traykovski, P. (2018). Tidal Flow Asymmetry Owing to Inertia and Waves on an Unstratified, Shallow Ebb Shoal. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 123(9), 6779–6799. https://doi.org/10.1029/2017JC013625

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free