Dry matter and nitrogen allocation in western redcedar, western hemlock, and Douglas fir seedlings grown in low- and high-N soils

5Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Seedlings of western red cedar (Thuja plicata Donn ex. D. Don), western hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla (Raf.) Sarg.), and Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco) were transplanted into each of 48 pots with soils of low or high levels of available NO3- (and total N) and assigned to one of four treatments: unamended control; amendment with 60 mg kg-1 (NH4)2SO4; amendment with 15 mg kg-1 of the nitrification inhibitor dicyandiamide (DCD) or amendment with both (NH4)2SO4 and DCD. Dry weight and N content increments of seedling tissues were determined after 8 weeks. Seedlings grown on the low-N soil accumulated 65 % of the dry matter and 40 % of the N accumulated by seedlings grown on the high-N soil. Retranslocation of N from year-old foliage and the stem/branch components of western red cedar and Douglas fir, but not western hemlock, was an important source of N for current-year foliage and roots of low-N-grown seedlings. Western hemlock achieved the greatest relative dry-matter increment (Loge(DMfinal) - Loge(DMinitial); RDMI) and relative N increment (Loge(Nfinal) - Loge(Ninitial); RNI) in each soil and accumulated 35 % more N from the low-N and 10 % more N from the high-N soils than the other species. The RDMI of western red cedar was intermediate between that of western hemlock and Douglas fir, whereas its RNI on each of the soils was lowest. The results suggest that western hemlock is more efficient than western red cedar or Douglas fir in acquiring inorganic N, especially from low-N soils. © 1999 Éditions scientifiques et médicales Elsevier SAS.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Graff, J. E., Hermann, R. K., & Zaerr, J. B. (1999). Dry matter and nitrogen allocation in western redcedar, western hemlock, and Douglas fir seedlings grown in low- and high-N soils. Annals of Forest Science, 56(7), 529–538. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:19990701

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free