Cellular responses to 3D printed dental resins produced using a manufacturer recommended printer versus a third party printer

5Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

PURPOSE. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of different 3D dental resins, using a manufacturer recommended printer and a third-party printer, on cellular responses of human gingival cells. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Three NextDent resins (Denture 3D+, C&B MFH and Crowntec) were used to produce specimens on printers NextDent 5100 (groups ND, NC and NT, respectively) and Phrozen Sonic Mini 4K (groups PD, PC and PT, respectively). Human gingival fibroblasts were cultured and biocompatibility was evaluated on days 1, 3 and 7. IL-6 and IL-8 concentrations were evaluated at 3 days using ELISA. Surface roughness was evaluated by a contact profilometer. SEM and fluorescence micrographs were analyzed at days 1 and 7. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS and mean differences were tested using ANOVA and post-hoc Tukey tests (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cardoso, B. S., da Cruz, M. B., Marques, J. F., Roque, J. C., Martins, J. P., Malheiro, R. C., & da Mata, A. D. (2024). Cellular responses to 3D printed dental resins produced using a manufacturer recommended printer versus a third party printer. Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics, 16(2), 126–138. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2024.16.2.126

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free