Abstract
PURPOSE. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of different 3D dental resins, using a manufacturer recommended printer and a third-party printer, on cellular responses of human gingival cells. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Three NextDent resins (Denture 3D+, C&B MFH and Crowntec) were used to produce specimens on printers NextDent 5100 (groups ND, NC and NT, respectively) and Phrozen Sonic Mini 4K (groups PD, PC and PT, respectively). Human gingival fibroblasts were cultured and biocompatibility was evaluated on days 1, 3 and 7. IL-6 and IL-8 concentrations were evaluated at 3 days using ELISA. Surface roughness was evaluated by a contact profilometer. SEM and fluorescence micrographs were analyzed at days 1 and 7. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS and mean differences were tested using ANOVA and post-hoc Tukey tests (P
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Cardoso, B. S., da Cruz, M. B., Marques, J. F., Roque, J. C., Martins, J. P., Malheiro, R. C., & da Mata, A. D. (2024). Cellular responses to 3D printed dental resins produced using a manufacturer recommended printer versus a third party printer. Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics, 16(2), 126–138. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2024.16.2.126
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.