Against Thinning and Teleology: Politics and Objects in the Face of Catastrophe in Lear and Von Trier

6Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this essay, I write a companion piece to Bonnie Honig’s commentary on “Public Things.” In looking at Honig’s comments on Jonathan Lear’s Radical Hope and Lars von Trier’s film Melancholia, I focus on the question of stealth teleologies, particularly in Lear’s case. I argue that what Lear calls “radical hope” is not particularly radical. Instead, it disguises a teleology whereby, passing through some catastrophe, redemption follows. Against this kind of automatism, I argue that in Honig’s own reading, we find the grounds for a turn away from teleology and toward radical contingency, a way of connecting with and via objects that allows us access to an agonal and anti-teleological form of politics (something that I also see as being offered in von Trier’s film).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Martel, J. (2015). Against Thinning and Teleology: Politics and Objects in the Face of Catastrophe in Lear and Von Trier. Political Research Quarterly, 68(3), 642–646. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912915595086

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free